For Mauritian chambers and firms

A back office built on Mauritian law, not a generic legal LLM.

Research threads, a document Vault, Workflow Agents and a Review Grid for your matters, grounded in an owned corpus of Mauritian case law and legislation. Every answer cites its source or refuses to answer.

Question

What notice period must an employer give before terminating a contract of indeterminate duration?

The Workers' Rights Act 2019 sets a minimum period of notice, and the Industrial Court has treated it as a floor rather than a default the parties may bargain below.

An illustration of the answer format. The Act, the judgment and the article are real; the wording is abridged for this page.

Screens throughout this site show a demo firm with illustrative matters. The legislation and judgments cited are real.

Every level of the Mauritian courts

Judgments from the Privy Council down to the District Courts and the specialist tribunals, alongside the legislation they apply.

  1. Judicial Committee of the Privy Council
  2. Supreme Court
    Master's Court
  3. Intermediate Court
    Industrial Court
  4. District Courts
    Bail and Remand Court
    Court of Rodrigues
    Children's Court
Specialist tribunals Employment Relations Tribunal, Environment and Land Use Appeal Tribunal, Permanent Arbitration Tribunal, Civil Service Arbitration Tribunal
The law they apply The Constitution, the Code Civil, Code de Commerce and Code de Procedure Civile, Acts and subsidiary instruments

Counts are the documents juris holds, read from the live index.

Everything your team needs, grounded the same way

One engine, one citation guard, six surfaces built for how a firm actually works.

  1. Research threads

    Ask a question in plain language, in English, French or Kreol Morisien, and get a grounded answer with citations back to the judgment or code article.

  2. Document Vault

    Upload matter documents. They are chunked, embedded and searchable alongside the corpus, scoped strictly to your firm.

  3. Workflow Agents

    Configurable, multi-step research workflows for recurring tasks, each step grounded the same way as a single research question.

  4. Review Grid

    Run one question across many documents or matters at once and read the answers side by side, each one still individually cited.

  5. Matter workspaces

    Organise threads, documents and workflow runs by matter, with role-based access for everyone in the firm.

  6. Admin console

    Seats, usage and audit log for the firm's own administrators, no separate request to us required for day-to-day account management.

Your firm's own juris, running where you decide

Every firm gets a deployment of its own: its own application, database and credentials, never shared with another firm. Then you choose how far your work travels, up to a machine in your chambers that nothing leaves.

A Frontier cloud

The most capable frontier models index your documents, rank the passages and write the answer. Every supplier is named in your agreement, and none may keep your material or train on it. This is how juris runs today.

B Documents in house

Your documents are indexed inside your own instance, so the copy of their words that option A sends out never leaves. Research over Mauritian law, and the models that write the answers, are unchanged. The first change we would make.

C Restricted matters local

A matter you mark restricted is kept, indexed and answered on a machine in your chambers, so nothing from it reaches any supplier at any point. Every other matter, and all research over Mauritian law, keeps the frontier models.

D Everything local

The whole system on hardware in your building, search over the Mauritian corpus included. Nothing leaves at any point. The largest change, and the largest machine.

Four steps, and the guard sits on all of them

Nothing here is a black box. Every stage is something you can inspect, and the last one is the reason the others matter.

Bring the matter

Create the matter, add the people who should see it, and upload the contracts, pleadings and correspondence it turns on.

Ask in your own language

Put the question the way you would put it to a colleague, in English, French or Kreol Morisien. The corpus is bilingual and the Codes are read in French.

Read the answer with its sources

Every claim carries a chip you can open. The statute is quoted, the judgment is named, and the passage that supports it is one click away.

Check what it refused

Where the sources do not carry a precise answer, juris says so instead of writing fluent text with nothing under it. That refusal is the product working.

What it is not

juris does not predict outcomes and never expresses a probability of winning or losing. Under the Law Practitioners Act 1984, only a person on the Roll may give legal advice or act in a matter, and juris does not do either. It answers only from retrieved sources, cites them, and refuses rather than guessing where the sources do not support a precise answer. The instructing practitioner remains of record for every matter run through it.

Read the full position

Hosting

Each firm's back office is its own instance, with its own application, database and credentials, never shared with another firm.

It runs where you decide: hosted in Mauritius, hosted in Europe, or on a machine in your chambers.

How your firm's instance is run

We built the refusal before we built anything else. A legal assistant that answers everything is worth less than one that tells you where the record runs out.

iSlayer Consultancy Ltd, the team behind juris

What firms ask us first

Do you train on our documents?
Not without your explicit, separate consent. That is what our terms say, and we would rather quote them than give you a rounder answer than we can stand behind.
Where does our data actually sit?
Where you decide. The public juris service runs in Falkenstein, Germany. A firm's own instance is hosted in Mauritius, in Europe if you prefer it, or on a machine in your chambers, and we set out in writing exactly what leaves it and when.
Can it tell us whether we will win?
No, and it is built so it cannot. The corpus carries no outcome labels, and a confident verdict from software is exactly the thing the Law Practitioners Act 1984 reserves to a person on the Roll.
What happens when it does not know?
It refuses and says why. Citations that cannot be matched to a retrieved source are marked rather than quietly dropped, so you can see the gap instead of discovering it in court.

Talk to us about your firm

There is no self-serve signup. Every engagement starts with a conversation about your firm's matters and how the back office should be set up for you.